The Bottle of Wine

My friend David passed this along. It made me chuckle:

THE BOTTLE OF WINE  

Sally was driving home from one of her business trips in Northern Arizona when she saw an elderly Navajo woman walking on the side of the road.  
 
As the trip was a long and quiet one, she stopped the car and asked the Navajo woman if she would like a ride.  
 
With a silent nod of thanks, the woman got into the car.  
 
Resuming the journey, Sally tried in vain to make a bit of small talk with the Navajo woman. The old woman just sat silently, looking intently at everything she saw, studying every little detail, until she noticed a brown bag on the seat next to Sally.  

“What in bag?” asked the old woman.  

Sally looked down at the brown bag and said, “It’s a bottle of wine. I got it for my husband.”  
 
The Navajo woman was silent for another moment or two.  Then speaking with the quiet wisdom of an elder, she said:  
 
“Good trade…..”  

Comments { 0 }

Why Doesn’t Facebook Have Bookmarks?

Whenever I scan my Facebook news feed, I see items I’d like to read, watch or comment upon, but don’t always have time to do so at that moment. If Facebook wants to expand its domination of C2C and B2C online communications, it should offer users a bookmark/favorite option.

If in addition to “Liking” a given post, we could actually save it to read or watch later, it would only accrue to the benefit of all.

  • We wouldn’t miss stories, photos or articles that interest us.
  • Page admins would have an additional metric to measure (how many people favorited their item).
  • Destination media (videos, blog posts, etc.) would benefit from otherwise missed traffic.
  • People could see (if the underlying privacy settings allow) which items their friends felt were interesting enough to bookmark, allowing “influencers” to have even more influence.

Does anyone know if FB has something like this in the works? Would you use it if they offered it?

What else do you think FB is missing (snark aside!) that would make it more useful?

Comments { 4 }

No, Facebook Doesn’t ‘Own’ Your Private Photos

Another panicky status meme is making the Facebook rounds. And while there’s a grain of truth buried in it – as there is with many memes – it’s surrounded by some scare-mongering misinformation.

The current status meme reads something like this:

ATTENTION: This Friday, Facebook will become owner of the publishing rights of ALL your private photos. You need to make a simple change: go to ‘account’, ‘account settings’, ‘facebook adverts’(along the top), ‘ads shown by third parties’, choose ‘NO ONE’ then SAVE. Takes seconds to fix. And please share share share. (for those who haven’t done this yet..)

That right there is two completely separate issues rolled into one. Let’s take them one at a time.

First: Facebook doesn’t “own” your private photos. In fact, section 2 of their Terms (have you ever read them? you might want to) explicitly states “You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook” (emphasis mine). They further state on their Facebook Ads Settings page, “Despite what you may have heard, Facebook does not give your personal information to advertisers—including your name, profile picture or any of your photos.”

According to those same terms, when you upload your photos or other intellectual property, y ou give Facebook a “non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post… this license ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.”

Why the non-exclusive license? So that they have the right to a) have your content on their servers and b) serve it to others, in accordance with your privacy preferences.

That brings us to part 2. Yes, Facebook is now (and has been) integrating their content into third party websites, and doing something they call “social advertising” on Facebook itself. That’s when they show you, in your sidebar, that such-and-such friend of yours “Liked” a given page or product, for example.  If that sort of thing wigs you out – as it does me – you can visit the Facebook Ads settings page, click on both Edit Third Party Ad Settings and Edit Social Ads settings and make sure you select “No One” for each of them.

My long-held opinion and personal preference is that the default sharing settings should always be the most private. Users should have to affirmatively opt-in to more public levels of sharing of their data and IP. However, since Facebook is provided free to users, it needs to make money in other ways, such as through advertising. They sell ads by mining our data, and our content (if we let them). So be it. We’re always free to choose not to use it, after all.

And while I’m no Facebook apologist, repeating erroneous information like “Facebook will own all your photos on Friday!” obscures the real message, which is: It’s a good idea, and your responsibility, to regularly review all of your Facebook privacy settings and make sure they’re how you want them to be.

Comments { 31 }

Interesting Links 4.19.11

Evidently the discipline of doing this daily has eluded me, but I’m picking up the pieces and carrying on. Here are the links I found interesting today:

 

Comments { 0 }

Smith College Visit

Photos from around the Smith College campus taken on April 14, 2011. I was there for the semi-annual Friends of the Smith College Libraries Executive Committee meeting.

College Hall

Collacott Reading Room, Neilson Library

Lyman Plant House

Paradise Pond

Dewey House

Chapin House

Campus Center

Seelye Lawn, looking toward Neilson Library

Comments { 0 }