Shaping the Q&A Process to Drive Better Proposals
Part of the RFP Clarity Series
This article is part of an ongoing series on improving the effectiveness of marketing RFPs—focused on clarity, strategy, and better outcomes for both issuers and agencies. Explore all posts in the RFP Clarity Series.
Questions Are Already Part of the Process. Are You Using Them Strategically?
Most RFPs include a formal opportunity for vendors to ask questions, typically with a deadline for submissions and a promise of shared answers. But how that window is structured – and how those questions are handled – can dramatically influence the quality of the proposals you receive.
Done well, the Q&A process encourages deeper engagement, surfaces hidden assumptions, and positions you as a thoughtful, well-prepared client. Done poorly, it creates confusion, inequity, or last-minute scrambles that degrade both your decision-making and the responses you get.
This isn’t about being more available or reactive. It’s about designing your Q&A process with strategic intent, fairness, and control, so the right questions surface at the right time, and your RFP stays on track.
Smart Agencies Will Have Questions. That’s a Good Thing.
If you’ve read Why Smart Agencies Always Have Questions About Your RFP, you know that agencies with strategic chops won’t just take your brief at face value. They’ll challenge assumptions, clarify constraints, and push for understanding – not to create friction, but to build better proposals.
And if you’ve read Strategic Ambiguity: When Less Is More in an RFP, you know that it’s smart (sometimes even necessary) to leave space for agencies to explore the boundaries of your ask. But when you do that, you have to be prepared for what comes next: questions.
If your process suppresses that exchange, either by design or by delay, you’re handicapping the very responses you want.
Set the Frame, Then Invite Dialogue
Inviting questions doesn’t mean losing control; it means establishing a clear and intentional framework. The most effective RFP issuers define how questions should be submitted, when the window for inquiries closes, and how answers will be shared. That structure allows vendors to engage confidently and ensures fairness across the board.
Consistency matters. Use a single point of contact to avoid mixed messages. Publish all responses in one organized document so that no agency is operating with privileged information. And when something truly needs clarification midstream, document it and make sure everyone gets the update.
What you’re doing isn’t managing chaos; you’re curating a professional exchange..
Time Is a Strategic Lever. Use It Wisely.
One of the most common missteps in RFP timelines is releasing answers to vendor questions too late in the process. If you issue responses just days before proposals are due, you’re forcing the vendors to prioritize speed over substance.
Strategic vendors use the Q&A phase to shape and sharpen their thinking. When you give them meaningful time with your final answers, you get better proposals in return.
Instead of rigid rules, focus on balance:
- Allow time for thoughtful questions to emerge.
- Build in a deliberate gap between posting answers and the proposal deadline.
- Think in terms of weeks, not days, when considering how long agencies should have to reflect and respond.
The structure of your timeline tells agencies whether you expect real thinking—or just a rapid response. (We’ll cover timelines in greater detail in our next post in the series.)
Your Q&A Is a Reputational Moment
Every aspect of the RFP process sends a signal. How you handle the Q&A period tells vendors what kind of partner you’ll be.
- Are you consistent?
- Are you candid when something’s still being decided?
- Do you respond with clarity – or evasion?
- Are your timelines reasonable?
- Are your questions relevant to the RFP, or are you repurposing a generic document?
These signals matter. Agencies remember which clients were buttoned-up, which ones welcomed good questions, and which ones ghosted the moment the RFP went out.
Control Is About Structure, Not Silence
It’s tempting to think the best way to “stay in control” of the process is to minimize engagement. But control doesn’t come from shutting down dialogue; it comes from structuring it well.
You can set boundaries and still be open. You can welcome smart questions and still decline to answer speculative or confidential ones. You can encourage clarification without negotiating the scope midstream.
It’s not about answering everything. It’s about answering the right things, clearly and consistently.
Closing Thought: Questions Don’t Derail the Process. They Strengthen It.
Handled strategically, the Q&A process isn’t a disruption. It’s a clarifier. It’s a chance to align expectations, refine your thinking, and encourage the kind of insight that leads to better work.
If you want smarter proposals, give your partners the time, space, and confidence to ask the right questions. You’ll learn just as much from their questions as they will from your answers.
Next up: Thoughtful timelines aren’t just considerate. They attract better work.
Smart organizations know that stronger RFPs lead to better partnerships. We help teams clarify what they really need, sharpen their evaluation criteria, and structure the RFP to attract the right response from the right partners. Whether you’re looking for a topline diagnostic, a strategic rewrite, or a full-process tune-up, we can help. Let’s talk.
Featured image generated by ChatGPT